Looking at the 81 (!)
recordings of Beethoven's violin concerto on my shelves, it would
appear that it is a difficult concerto to get right. The first
movement is long (typically around 24 minutes). The second movement
is a divine rhapsody of 9-10 minutes. The third movement is a
traditional 18th century rondo – usually a bit of a
cop-out, in my opinion, a bit like a movement of variations which
rarely impress as great music. Looking at my 81 recordings, it is the
old ones that come off best, and all are by German (or Austro-German)
violinists, perhaps for the same reason that performances of a
composer such as Rachmaninov are usually best when performed by
echt-Russians.
The five “best”
violinists in the Beethoven concerto, for me, are Fritz Kreisler
(1926 and 1936), Georg Kulenkampff (1936), Erich Röhn (1944), Adolf
Busch (1942 and 1949) and Wolfgang Schneiderhan (1952, 1953, 1954 and
1964). Kreisler was in his prime at 51 years old for his first
recording, but the Berlin Opera Orchestra under Leo Blech in 1926
were not great partners. I have a great affection for Georg
Kulenkampff in this work, with the Berlin Philharmonic during its
prime years and good transfers by both Michael Dutton and Pristine
Audio. Kulenkampff plays with an endearing simplicity, letting the
violin and the music do the talking without over-visible intervention
from the “interpreter”. Kulenkampff like most of the older
players with the exception of Schneiderhan, plays conventional
cadenzas rather than the wanna-be-different ones concocted by too
many modern violinists.
Mischa Elman and Maxim
Vengerov both win wooden spoons for their performances (with Vengerov
extending the first movement to nearly half and hour). A difficult
concerto to bring off, but I am happy with my five violinists
recorded between 1926 and 1964.
No comments:
Post a Comment