I am never over-fussy
about orchestras. Modern orchestras are filled with – often younger
– players who can cope with most technical challenges. As I have
mentioned before in this blog, I have the impression that one and two
star orchestras can often make for more rewarding listening, since
they try harder than their three star cousins, who are sometimes
content to rest on their laurels or past reputations. This seems to
be particularly true when it comes to accompanying soloists, and one
suspects that – particularly in the past – major orchestras here
often fielded ranks of substitute players, rather than the
principals. There are many reports of conductors in the past having
been nonplussed to discover that the orchestral personnel they were
conducting at the actual concert did not entirely correspond to the
orchestral personnel with whom they had been rehearsing!
All too often, three
star orchestras have become “brands”, in the modern parlance, so
much so that, a few years ago, the “Royal Philharmonic Orchestra”
was caught out playing two different concerts in two different
places; on the same evening! Common sense tells us that the Berlin
Philharmonic of the 1930s will not be the same Berlin Philharmonic of
the 1960s, or 90s, or the present day. Players change, and retire.
Orchestras go through good periods, viz the Philharmonia in
the 1950s and 60s, and weak periods, viz the London Symphony
Orchestra in the same period. Conductors known for their orchestral
training prowess, such as Toscanini, von Karajan, Stokowski, and
others, can make a big difference fairly quickly.
Nevertheless,
orchestras are not all the same. Russia, Scandinavia, Britain,
the Netherlands, Germany and America have usually offered a range of
fine orchestras whereas, for some reason, countries such as France,
Spain, Italy or Greece struggle in any given period to offer even one
orchestra of real international standard. France is particularly
puzzling, since the country boasts a strong range of first-rate
instrumentalists and numerous prestigious conservatoires. There are
orchestras in Paris, Toulouse and Lille, but it is difficult to think
of a famous French orchestra. As for Germany; the country bursts with
fine orchestras, some with major “brand” images such as the
Berlin and Vienna Philharmonics, not to mention the orchestras of
Dresden and Leipzig, with superb orchestras all over the place in
Hamburg, Munich, Cologne, Stuttgart and elsewhere – Bremen is a
recent fine contestant. I am very fond of the recordings by Günter
Wand that he made mostly in Cologne and Hamburg with regional German
radio orchestras; to my ears, the orchestras sound fine and I do not
miss their three star cousins.
Having said that,
however, orchestras can make a difference in certain respects;
Russian orchestras appear to dive into the music of Tchaikovsky,
Rachmaninov and Shostakovich in a particularly heart-felt way, as do
British orchestras in the music of Elgar – and the Vienna
Philharmonic in the music of Anton Bruckner. I marvelled recently at
the sound of the Vienna Philharmonic in Bruckner's eighth and ninth
symphonies (conducted by Carl Schuricht in the early 1960s); the
sound was simply so right. In
many respects, however, symphony orchestras are much like restaurants
or wine: they have their good periods and their bad periods, good
years and bad years, a change of chef can make a major difference as
can a change of ownership or funding. Ah, the Concertgebouw orchestra
of the 1970s vintage !
No comments:
Post a Comment